Amnify security agents vs Cursor Bugbot
Quick answer
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) (Amnify (Amnify GmbH)) and Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) (Amnify (Amnify GmbH)) and Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) |  Cursor Bugbot |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amnify (Amnify GmbH) | Anysphere |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. | Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation, pen test management, cloud security | pr review, appsec, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees. | Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://amnify.ai/ | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://amnify.ai/ | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Amnify security agents and Cursor Bugbot?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review, remediation. Amnify security agents-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, iac, pen-test-management, cloud-security. Cursor Bugbot-only tasks: none. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests): Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees. Cursor Bugbot: Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.
Where are Amnify security agents and Cursor Bugbot headquartered?
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) publishes HQ in Germany. Cursor Bugbot publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) or Cursor Bugbot. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) alternatives
- Cursor Bugbot alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Checkmarx One Assist