Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management
Quick answer
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting (Aikido Security) and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) (Qualys (Qualys, Inc.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting (Aikido Security) and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) (Qualys (Qualys, Inc.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido Attack AI Pentesting | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Qualys (Qualys, Inc.) |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. | Agent marketplace inside Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management where teams 'hire' AI agents that detect new exposures without scanning, safely validate exploitability, re-rank risk by active threat campaigns and run confidence-gated patch and patchless remediation with rollback and re-validation. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface, vulnerability management | vulnerability management, exposure management, remediation, risk prioritization, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: aikido.dev/pricing lists a free Developer tier and paid tiers that include monthly credits (for example 100 or 200 per month) usable for AI pentesting, plus a separate Pentest pricing tab. Check the vendor page for current amounts. | Not published (30-day trial offered) |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://www.qualys.com/apps/agentic-ai/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/attack/aipentest | https://www.qualys.com/apps/agentic-ai/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido Attack AI Pentesting and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management. Aikido Attack AI Pentesting-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec. Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management-only tasks: exposure-management, remediation, risk-prioritization. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting: Published: aikido.dev/pricing lists a free Developer tier and paid tiers that include monthly credits (for example 100 or 200 per month) usable for AI pentesting, plus a separate Pentest pricing tab. Check the vendor page for current amounts. Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid): Not published (30-day trial offered)
Where are Aikido Attack AI Pentesting and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management headquartered?
Aikido Attack AI Pentesting publishes HQ in Belgium. Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido Attack AI Pentesting or Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting alternatives
- Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Aikido Attack AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
More Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)