AIpentix vs Corma AI agents
Quick answer
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) (Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH)) and Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) (Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH)) and Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) is tagged for DORA.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH) | Corma (Corma SAS) |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | German continuous security-testing platform with an AI agent that signs in to the customer's application on its own, chooses follow-up checks and documents attack paths, with every tool run evidenced. Findings are grouped into remediation actions with owners, deadlines and Jira sync, and retests confirm fixes. Agentic red-team campaigns (recon, access, lateral and report agents led by human red teamers) are also offered for TIBER-EU and DORA TLPT style testing. | French identity and SaaS-management product whose custom AI agents automate joiner-mover-leaver provisioning, offboarding and other identity actions in web apps even when no API, SCIM or SAML is available, using a browser-based agent that interprets the admin UI and executes the workflow steps. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | DORA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | DORA TLPT, TIBER-EU | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, remediation | identity governance, access reviews, workflow automation, agentic ops |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between AIpentix and Corma AI agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. AIpentix-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, vulnerability-management, remediation. Corma AI agents-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, workflow-automation, agentic-ops. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy): Not published Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation): Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users.
Where are AIpentix and Corma AI agents headquartered?
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) publishes HQ in Germany. Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) or Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) alternatives
- Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) comparisons
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- 7AI agentic security platform vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
More Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)