Home / Compare / Apiiro Guardian Agent vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix

Apiiro Guardian Agent vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix

Quick answer

Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) (Apiiro (Apiiro Ltd)) and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection)	CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
Vendor	Apiiro (Apiiro Ltd)	CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)
HQ	Israel · Middle East	France · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	AppSec agent built on Apiiro's software 'Context Graph' that sits alongside developers' coding agents to prevent risky code at the prompt, and AutoFixes SAST, SCA, secrets, container and IaC findings with context-aware, AI-generated fixes routed to the right code owner.	French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, remediation, sast, sca, secrets detection, vulnerability management	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review
Integrations (vendor-listed)	coding agents via Guardian CLI (e.g. Claude), SCM / CI-CD, cloud (AWS, GCP), third-party AppSec tools	Not recorded in this dataset yet
Pricing (as published)	Not published; demo-led (Apiiro site, checked 2026-10-29).	Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote.
Pricing model	quote	freemium
Primary source	https://apiiro.com/	https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix
Last checked	2026-10-29	2026-10-19
Official site	https://apiiro.com/	https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Apiiro Guardian Agent and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast, sca, secrets-detection. Apiiro Guardian Agent-only tasks: vulnerability-management. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: iac, pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection): Not published; demo-led (Apiiro site, checked 2026-10-29). CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote.

Where are Apiiro Guardian Agent and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix headquartered?

Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) publishes HQ in Israel. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) or CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)