Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform vs Conveyor
Quick answer
Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) (Ares Cyber (Ares Cyber S.r.l.)) and Conveyor (Conveyor) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) (Ares Cyber (Ares Cyber S.r.l.)) and Conveyor (Conveyor) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Conveyor is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) |  Conveyor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Ares Cyber (Ares Cyber S.r.l.) | Conveyor |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Compliance, Business operations |
| Summary | Rome security-testing platform that runs SAST, SCA, IaC/secrets, DAST, vulnerability assessment and penetration testing as one pipeline, in which AI agents autonomously chain vulnerabilities and safely run exploits to prove which findings are exploitable, available as SaaS, self-hosted or an air-gapped appliance. | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, GDPR | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, appsec, sast, sca | questionnaire automation, trust center |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (Basic, Pro, Enterprise and Air-Gapped plans priced on request, billed annually; free trial offered) | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://ares-cyber.ai/ | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-15 |
| Official site | https://ares-cyber.ai/ | https://www.conveyor.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform and Conveyor?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, vulnerability-management, appsec, sast, sca. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest): Not published (Basic, Pro, Enterprise and Air-Gapped plans priced on request, billed annually; free trial offered) Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing.
Where are Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform and Conveyor headquartered?
Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) publishes HQ in Italy. Conveyor publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) or Conveyor. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) alternatives
- Conveyor alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform (autonomous exploit chaining and runtime verification across SAST, SCA, DAST, VA and pentest)