Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
Quick answer
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
Both are tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001 in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. Both are tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001 in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for DORA.
| Field |  Conveyor |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Conveyor | Hadrian |
| HQ | United States · North America | Netherlands · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance, Business operations | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK |
| Capabilities / tasks | questionnaire automation, trust center | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec |
| Pricing (as published) | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
| Last checked | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://www.conveyor.com/ | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Conveyor and Hadrian Nova?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Hadrian Nova-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting): Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing).
Where are Conveyor and Hadrian Nova headquartered?
Conveyor publishes HQ in United States. Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in Netherlands.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Conveyor or Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Conveyor alternatives
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
- SOC 2 hub
- ISO 27001 hub
- Best SOC 2 AI agents
- Best ISO 27001 AI agents
More Conveyor comparisons
- Conveyor vs SafeBase
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Conveyor
- Conveyor vs Mondoo
- Conveyor vs Orca Security
- Conveyor vs Snyk