Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs SafeBase
Quick answer
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and SafeBase (Drata (acquired SafeBase)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
Both are tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001 in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and SafeBase (Drata (acquired SafeBase)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. Both are tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001 in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for DORA.
| Field |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |  SafeBase |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hadrian | Drata (acquired SafeBase) |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Compliance, Business operations |
| Summary | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | Trust Center and AI Questionnaire Assistance for customer security reviews, now part of Drata (SafeBase brand being unified into Drata). |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | trust center, questionnaire automation |
| Pricing (as published) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://drata.com/blog/announcing-new-drata-look |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-16 |
| Official site | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://drata.com/safebase |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Hadrian Nova and SafeBase?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Hadrian Nova-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. SafeBase-only tasks: trust-center, questionnaire-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting): Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). SafeBase: Not published
Where are Hadrian Nova and SafeBase headquartered?
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in Netherlands. SafeBase publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) or SafeBase. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- SafeBase alternatives
- Best security AI agents
- SOC 2 hub
- ISO 27001 hub
- Best SOC 2 AI agents
- Best ISO 27001 AI agents
More Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Mondoo
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Snyk