Atomicwork IGA Agent vs RunSybil Sybil
Quick answer
Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) (Atomicwork (Atomicwork Inc.)) and RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) (RunSybil) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) (Atomicwork (Atomicwork Inc.)) and RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) (RunSybil) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) |  RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Atomicwork (Atomicwork Inc.) | RunSybil |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Business operations | Security, Code security |
| Summary | AI coworker on Atomicwork's agentic ITSM/ESM platform that handles access requests end to end: it reviews context, applies policy, routes approvals to the right owners in Slack or Teams, provisions and deprovisions access and enforces just-in-time access, acting without human intervention unless policy requires it. Listed tools include Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, JumpCloud and Microsoft Intune. | AI offensive security platform whose agents run black- or white-box autonomous pentests, chain vulnerabilities across code, APIs, cloud and infrastructure, reproduce every finding, and re-test on each deployment. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | identity governance, it service, workflow automation | pen test management, attack surface, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 / Entra, Slack | Not recorded in this dataset yet |
| Pricing (as published) | Professional from $25,000/year billed annually (includes 25,000 credits and 2 AI Coworkers, up to 250 end users); additional AI Coworkers $499/worker/month; outcome-based option: access automation $2 per outcome. Business and Enterprise by quote. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.atomicwork.com/features/access-management | https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.atomicwork.com/features/access-management | https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Atomicwork IGA Agent and RunSybil Sybil?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Atomicwork IGA Agent-only tasks: identity-governance, it-service, workflow-automation. RunSybil Sybil-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, appsec, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce): Professional from $25,000/year billed annually (includes 25,000 credits and 2 AI Coworkers, up to 250 end users); additional AI Coworkers $499/worker/month; outcome-based option: access automation $2 per outcome. Business and Enterprise by quote. RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting): Not published
Where are Atomicwork IGA Agent and RunSybil Sybil headquartered?
Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) publishes HQ in United States. RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) or RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
- IT service-management AI agents — 7 listings (IT service desk, employee support and service-workflow automation)
Related
- Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) alternatives
- RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Atomicwork IGA Agent (agentic access provisioning on Atomicwork's AI Workforce)
More RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)