Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) vs Conveyor
Quick answer
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) (Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.)) and Conveyor (Conveyor) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) (Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.)) and Conveyor (Conveyor) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Conveyor is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) |  Conveyor |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.) | Conveyor |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Compliance, Business operations |
| Summary | Italian AI-native offensive platform product: Arcangelo continuously maps internal and external attack surfaces, then runs adaptive multi-stage agentic penetration tests that plan and pivot like an attacker, with potentially intrusive exploitation kept human-approved and auditable. | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, threat intelligence | questionnaire automation, trust center |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://beelzebub.ai/products/arcangelo/ | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-15 |
| Official site | https://beelzebub.ai/products/arcangelo/ | https://www.conveyor.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Beelzebub Arcangelo and Conveyor?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Beelzebub Arcangelo-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, threat-intelligence. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing): Not published Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing.
Where are Beelzebub Arcangelo and Conveyor headquartered?
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) publishes HQ in Italy. Conveyor publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) or Conveyor. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) alternatives
- Conveyor alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)