Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)

Quick answer

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) (Black Duck) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) (Black Duck) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
Vendor Black DuckAmazon Web Services
HQ United States · North AmericaUnited States · North America
Primary category Code securityCode security
Also listed in Code security, SecurityCode security
Summary Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP.Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) —FedRAMP
FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) —AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) —FedRAMP
Capabilities / tasks appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability managementagent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review
Pricing (as published) Not publishedPublished: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check).
Pricing model quotefreemium
Primary source https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.htmlhttps://kiro.dev/powers/
Last checked 2026-10-182026-10-18
Official site https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.htmlhttps://kiro.dev/powers/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Black Duck Signal and Kiro?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Black Duck Signal-only tasks: sast, remediation, vulnerability-management. Kiro-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec): Not published Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check).

Where are Black Duck Signal and Kiro headquartered?

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) publishes HQ in United States. Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States.

Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) comparisons

More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons