Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Checkmarx One Assist
Quick answer
Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) (Black Duck) and Checkmarx One Assist (Checkmarx) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) (Black Duck) and Checkmarx One Assist (Checkmarx) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) |  Checkmarx One Assist |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Black Duck | Checkmarx |
| HQ | United States · North America | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP. | Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, ide assist |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not verified |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.html | https://checkmarx.com/product/checkmarx-one-assist/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.html | https://checkmarx.com/product/checkmarx-one-assist/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Black Duck Signal and Checkmarx One Assist?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability-management. Black Duck Signal-only tasks: none. Checkmarx One Assist-only tasks: ide-assist. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec): Not published Checkmarx One Assist: Not published
Where are Black Duck Signal and Checkmarx One Assist headquartered?
Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) publishes HQ in United States. Checkmarx One Assist publishes HQ in Israel.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) or Checkmarx One Assist. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) alternatives
- Checkmarx One Assist alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Claude Code security review
More Checkmarx One Assist comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review