Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
Quick answer
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Checkmarx One Assist (Checkmarx) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Checkmarx One Assist (Checkmarx) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  Checkmarx One Assist |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Checkmarx |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, ide assist |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Not verified |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://checkmarx.com/product/checkmarx-one-assist/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://checkmarx.com/product/checkmarx-one-assist/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido AI AutoFix and Checkmarx One Assist?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability-management. Aikido AI AutoFix-only tasks: iac. Checkmarx One Assist-only tasks: ide-assist. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido AI AutoFix: Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. Checkmarx One Assist: Not published
Where are Aikido AI AutoFix and Checkmarx One Assist headquartered?
Aikido AI AutoFix publishes HQ in Belgium. Checkmarx One Assist publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or Checkmarx One Assist. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
More Checkmarx One Assist comparisons
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review