Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review
Quick answer
Checkmarx One Assist (Checkmarx) and Claude Code security review (Anthropic) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Checkmarx One Assist (Checkmarx) and Claude Code security review (Anthropic) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Checkmarx One Assist |  Claude Code security review |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Checkmarx | Anthropic |
| HQ | Israel · Middle East | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel. | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, ide assist | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Not verified | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://checkmarx.com/product/checkmarx-one-assist/ | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://checkmarx.com/product/checkmarx-one-assist/ | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Checkmarx One Assist and Claude Code security review?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, vulnerability-management. Checkmarx One Assist-only tasks: remediation, ide-assist. Claude Code security review-only tasks: pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Checkmarx One Assist: Not published Claude Code security review: Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key.
Where are Checkmarx One Assist and Claude Code security review headquartered?
Checkmarx One Assist publishes HQ in Israel. Claude Code security review publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Checkmarx One Assist or Claude Code security review. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Checkmarx One Assist alternatives
- Claude Code security review alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Checkmarx One Assist comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Checkmarx One Assist
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Claude Code security review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Claude Code security review