Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
Quick answer
Amazon Q Developer security scanning (Amazon Web Services) and Claude Code security review (Anthropic) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Amazon Q Developer security scanning (Amazon Web Services) and Claude Code security review (Anthropic) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Amazon Q Developer security scanning |  Claude Code security review |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Anthropic |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes. | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, remediation | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Free Tier with monthly limits; Amazon Q Developer Pro is $19 per user/month on aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing. Security scanning is a capability of those tiers, not a separately priced SKU on that page. | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonq/latest/qdeveloper-ug/code-reviews.html | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonq/latest/qdeveloper-ug/code-reviews.html | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Amazon Q Developer security scanning and Claude Code security review?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast. Amazon Q Developer security scanning-only tasks: secrets-detection, sca, iac, remediation. Claude Code security review-only tasks: pr-review, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Amazon Q Developer security scanning: Free Tier with monthly limits; Amazon Q Developer Pro is $19 per user/month on aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing. Security scanning is a capability of those tiers, not a separately priced SKU on that page. Claude Code security review: Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key.
Where are Amazon Q Developer security scanning and Claude Code security review headquartered?
Amazon Q Developer security scanning publishes HQ in United States. Claude Code security review publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Amazon Q Developer security scanning or Claude Code security review. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning alternatives
- Claude Code security review alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Amazon Q Developer security scanning comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Checkmarx One Assist
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Claude Code security review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Claude Code security review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Claude Code security review
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Claude Code security review