Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
Quick answer
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Amazon Q Developer security scanning (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Amazon Q Developer security scanning (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  Amazon Q Developer security scanning |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Amazon Web Services |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Free Tier with monthly limits; Amazon Q Developer Pro is $19 per user/month on aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing. Security scanning is a capability of those tiers, not a separately priced SKU on that page. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonq/latest/qdeveloper-ug/code-reviews.html |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonq/latest/qdeveloper-ug/code-reviews.html |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido AI AutoFix and Amazon Q Developer security scanning?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast, iac. Aikido AI AutoFix-only tasks: vulnerability-management. Amazon Q Developer security scanning-only tasks: secrets-detection, sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido AI AutoFix: Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. Amazon Q Developer security scanning: Free Tier with monthly limits; Amazon Q Developer Pro is $19 per user/month on aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing. Security scanning is a capability of those tiers, not a separately priced SKU on that page.
Where are Aikido AI AutoFix and Amazon Q Developer security scanning headquartered?
Aikido AI AutoFix publishes HQ in Belgium. Amazon Q Developer security scanning publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or Amazon Q Developer security scanning. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Aikido AI AutoFix alternatives
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
More Amazon Q Developer security scanning comparisons
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Checkmarx One Assist
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review