Cakewalk Agent Cake vs Filigran XTM One
Quick answer
Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) (Cakewalk (Cakewalk Technology GmbH)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) (Cakewalk (Cakewalk Technology GmbH)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cakewalk (Cakewalk Technology GmbH) | Filigran (Filigran SAS) |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Business operations | Security |
| Summary | Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Capabilities / tasks | identity governance, access reviews, workflow automation, employee support | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.cakewalk.security/agent-cake | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.cakewalk.security/agent-cake | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Cakewalk Agent Cake and Filigran XTM One?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Cakewalk Agent Cake-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, workflow-automation, employee-support. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests): Not published Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server)
Where are Cakewalk Agent Cake and Filigran XTM One headquartered?
Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) publishes HQ in Germany. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) or Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) alternatives
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests)
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)