Claude Code security review vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix
Quick answer
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS) |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. | Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | freemium |
| Primary source | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Claude Code security review and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review, sast. Claude Code security review-only tasks: vulnerability-management. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: sca, secrets-detection, iac, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Claude Code security review: Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote.
Where are Claude Code security review and CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix headquartered?
Claude Code security review publishes HQ in United States. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Claude Code security review or CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Claude Code security review alternatives
- CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Claude Code security review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Claude Code security review
More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)