Claude Code security review vs Qodo multi-agent code review
Quick answer
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Claude Code security review |  Qodo multi-agent code review |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | Qodo (Codium Ltd.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management | pr review, appsec, code quality |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. | Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Claude Code security review and Qodo multi-agent code review?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review. Claude Code security review-only tasks: sast, vulnerability-management. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Claude Code security review: Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page.
Where are Claude Code security review and Qodo multi-agent code review headquartered?
Claude Code security review publishes HQ in United States. Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Claude Code security review or Qodo multi-agent code review. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Claude Code security review alternatives
- Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Claude Code security review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Claude Code security review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Claude Code security review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Claude Code security review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Claude Code security review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Claude Code security review
More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Qodo multi-agent code review