Home / Compare / Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent vs KELA Digital CTI Analysts

Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent vs KELA Digital CTI Analysts

Quick answer

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) (Co-Brain (Co-Brain GmbH)) and KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) (KELA (Kela Research and Strategy Ltd.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) is tagged for DORA.

Field	Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)	KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts)
Vendor	Co-Brain (Co-Brain GmbH)	KELA (Kela Research and Strategy Ltd.)
HQ	Germany · Europe	Israel · Middle East
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security, Compliance, Risk	Security
Summary	German agent that completes incoming security questionnaires (vendor assessments, TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA) in Excel, PDF, Word or vendor portals from the customer's policies, certificates and past answers, with a source citation on every answer, consistent answers to re-worded questions, expert routing and team approval.	Always-on agentic threat-intelligence analysts trained on KELA's cybercrime data lake: Alex (enterprises and MSSPs) and Ethan (government and law enforcement) monitor the organisation's threat landscape 24/7, prioritise and proactively surface leaked credentials, targeted threats and threat-actor profiles, answer analyst questions and generate RFIs, working inside existing tools via API, MCP, webhooks and a built-in SOAR.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	DORA	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA, GDPR	—
Capabilities / tasks	questionnaire automation, workflow automation	threat intelligence, threat detection, alert triage, case investigation
Integrations (vendor-listed)	Not recorded in this dataset yet	REST API, MCP, webhooks, built-in SOAR, Slack, Microsoft Teams, email
Pricing (as published)	Not published	Not published; demo-led, with a free start option on kelacyber.com (checked 2026-10-29).
Pricing model	quote	quote
Primary source	https://co-brain.ai/en/questionnaire-agent	https://www.kelacyber.com/platform/digital-cti-analysts/
Last checked	2026-10-19	2026-10-29
Official site	https://co-brain.ai/en/questionnaire-agent	https://www.kelacyber.com/platform/digital-cti-analysts/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent and KELA Digital CTI Analysts?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, workflow-automation. KELA Digital CTI Analysts-only tasks: threat-intelligence, threat-detection, alert-triage, case-investigation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation): Not published KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts): Not published; demo-led, with a free start option on kelacyber.com (checked 2026-10-29).

Where are Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent and KELA Digital CTI Analysts headquartered?

Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) publishes HQ in Germany. KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) publishes HQ in Israel.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) or KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.

Use-case comparisons

AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 52 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 42 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)