CodeWall autonomous attack agents vs Filigran XTM One
Quick answer
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) (CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) (CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd) | Filigran (Filigran SAS) |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | UK offensive-security product that deploys autonomous attack agents starting from the outside with no credentials or source code: specialist agents investigate in parallel, share discoveries on a persistent investigation graph, prove exploitable paths across applications, identities and data, and retest within authorised scope as the environment changes. | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://codewall.ai/ | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://codewall.ai/ | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CodeWall autonomous attack agents and Filigran XTM One?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management, exposure-management. CodeWall autonomous attack agents-only tasks: attack-surface, appsec. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, threat-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing): Not published Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server)
Where are CodeWall autonomous attack agents and Filigran XTM One headquartered?
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) or Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) alternatives
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)