CodeWall autonomous attack agents vs Material Security AI agents
Quick answer
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) (CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd)) and Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) (CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd)) and Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd) | Material Security |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | UK offensive-security product that deploys autonomous attack agents starting from the outside with no credentials or source code: specialist agents investigate in parallel, share discoveries on a persistent investigation graph, prove exploitable paths across applications, identities and data, and retest within authorised scope as the environment changes. | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://codewall.ai/ | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://codewall.ai/ | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CodeWall autonomous attack agents and Material Security AI agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. CodeWall autonomous attack agents-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation, incident-response, cloud-security. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing): Not published Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote.
Where are CodeWall autonomous attack agents and Material Security AI agents headquartered?
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) or Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) alternatives
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)