Devin vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
Quick answer
Devin (Cognition) and Pixee (automated triage and fix) (Pixee) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Devin (Cognition) and Pixee (automated triage and fix) (Pixee) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cognition | Pixee |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product. | Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, appsec | appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). | Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/mcp | https://www.pixee.ai/platform |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://devin.ai/ | https://www.pixee.ai/platform |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Devin and Pixee?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation, appsec. Devin-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Pixee-only tasks: sast, sca, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Devin: Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). Pixee (automated triage and fix): Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote.
Where are Devin and Pixee headquartered?
Devin publishes HQ in United States. Pixee (automated triage and fix) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Devin comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Devin
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Devin
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Devin
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Devin
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Devin
More Pixee (automated triage and fix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)