Home / Compare / Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC vs episki Autonomous GRC

Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC vs episki Autonomous GRC

Quick answer

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC (AI Evidence Analysis, AI Compliance Auditor, AI Cyber Risk Quantification and more) (Commugen (Commugen Ltd)) and episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC (AI Evidence Analysis, AI Compliance Auditor, AI Cyber Risk Quantification and more) is tagged for ISO 27001.

Field	Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC (AI Evidence Analysis, AI Compliance Auditor, AI Cyber Risk Quantification and more)	episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
Vendor	Commugen (Commugen Ltd)	episki (episki, llc)
HQ	Israel · Middle East	United States · North America
Primary category	Compliance	Compliance
Also listed in	Compliance, Risk	Compliance, Risk
Summary	No-code cyber GRC platform that launched a portfolio of AI agents on Oct 27, 2026: they review supplier evidence and questionnaires, verify supplier entities and recommend accept/reject statuses with a score, map findings to controls, draft policies, break down pen-test reports, quantify cyber risk in money terms and turn findings into owned tasks, with a named human signing off on consequential decisions.	A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	ISO 27001	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	ISO/IEC 27001:2022, NIST CSF 2.0	SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act
Capabilities / tasks	vendor risk, evidence collection, policy management, control mapping, risk assessment, audit management	policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust center
Pricing (as published)	Not published; agents are sold as add-ons to the Commugen platform (launch release, Oct 27, 2026; checked 2026-10-29).	Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.
Pricing model	quote	published-tiers
Primary source	https://cyber.commugen.com/commugen-ai	https://episki.com/product/ai
Last checked	2026-10-29	2026-10-19
Official site	https://cyber.commugen.com/commugen-ai	https://episki.com/product/ai

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC and episki Autonomous GRC?

Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: vendor-risk, evidence-collection, policy-management, control-mapping, risk-assessment. Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC-only tasks: audit-management. episki Autonomous GRC-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC (AI Evidence Analysis, AI Compliance Auditor, AI Cyber Risk Quantification and more): Not published; agents are sold as add-ons to the Commugen platform (launch release, Oct 27, 2026; checked 2026-10-29). episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence): Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.

Where are Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC and episki Autonomous GRC headquartered?

Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC (AI Evidence Analysis, AI Compliance Auditor, AI Cyber Risk Quantification and more) publishes HQ in Israel. episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) publishes HQ in United States.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Commugen AI agents for cyber GRC (AI Evidence Analysis, AI Compliance Auditor, AI Cyber Risk Quantification and more) or episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 42 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)