Contrast AI SmartFix vs ZeroPath
Quick answer
Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) (Contrast Security) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) (Contrast Security) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Contrast Security | ZeroPath |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | An AI agent that runs as a GitHub Action, takes vulnerabilities found by Contrast's IAST (Assess) and SAST, writes code fixes using runtime context, runs your build and tests, and opens pull requests for developers to review. | AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.contrastsecurity.com/en/contrast-ai-smartfix.html | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.contrastsecurity.com/en/contrast-ai-smartfix.html | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Contrast AI SmartFix and ZeroPath?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation, pr-review. Contrast AI SmartFix-only tasks: none. ZeroPath-only tasks: sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation): Not published ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix): Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.
Where are Contrast AI SmartFix and ZeroPath headquartered?
Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) publishes HQ in United States. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) or ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) alternatives
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)