Aikido AI AutoFix vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
Quick answer
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) (Contrast Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) (Contrast Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Contrast Security |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | An AI agent that runs as a GitHub Action, takes vulnerabilities found by Contrast's IAST (Assess) and SAST, writes code fixes using runtime context, runs your build and tests, and opens pull requests for developers to review. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Not published |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://docs.contrastsecurity.com/en/contrast-ai-smartfix.html |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://docs.contrastsecurity.com/en/contrast-ai-smartfix.html |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido AI AutoFix and Contrast AI SmartFix?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast. Aikido AI AutoFix-only tasks: vulnerability-management, iac. Contrast AI SmartFix-only tasks: pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido AI AutoFix: Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation): Not published
Where are Aikido AI AutoFix and Contrast AI SmartFix headquartered?
Aikido AI AutoFix publishes HQ in Belgium. Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Aikido AI AutoFix alternatives
- Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
More Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) comparisons
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)