Conveyor vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
Quick answer
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Conveyor is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Conveyor |  Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Conveyor | Equixly |
| HQ | United States · North America | Italy · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance, Business operations | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. | Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | questionnaire automation, trust center | pen test management, appsec, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. | Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing | https://equixly.com/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.conveyor.com/ | https://equixly.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Conveyor and Equixly Agentic AI Hacker?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Equixly Agentic AI Hacker-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting): Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing).
Where are Conveyor and Equixly Agentic AI Hacker headquartered?
Conveyor publishes HQ in United States. Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) publishes HQ in Italy.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Conveyor or Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Conveyor alternatives
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Conveyor comparisons
- Conveyor vs SafeBase
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Conveyor
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Mondoo
- Conveyor vs Orca Security
More Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)