CounterShadow AMI vs Mave agentic SecOps
Quick answer
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents) (Mave (Mave Security Ltd.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents) (Mave (Mave Security Ltd.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response |  Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd) | Mave (Mave Security Ltd.) |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures. | Agentic SecOps platform whose governed AI agents investigate every alert across the security tools a company already runs, hunt threats, improve detections and trigger authorised response actions, without ingesting data into a new lake; teams set policies, permissions and approval gates. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident response | security operations, alert triage, case investigation, threat detection, incident response, threat intelligence |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published; priced by number of endpoints and security-team size (custom quote form on mave.com/pricing, checked 2026-10-23) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://countershadow.com/ | https://www.mave.com/solutions/ai-soc |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-23 |
| Official site | https://countershadow.com/ | https://www.mave.com/solutions/ai-soc |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CounterShadow AMI and Mave agentic SecOps?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation, incident-response. CounterShadow AMI-only tasks: none. Mave agentic SecOps-only tasks: threat-detection, threat-intelligence. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response: Not published Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents): Not published; priced by number of endpoints and security-team size (custom quote form on mave.com/pricing, checked 2026-10-23)
Where are CounterShadow AMI and Mave agentic SecOps headquartered?
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents) publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response or Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail.
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
- Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) — Agentic AI inside Trulioo's KYB verification workflow from Vancouver-headquartered Trulioo. When registries run out, the UBO Discovery Agent researches filings, disclosures, legal and public records, OSINT and verified third-party databases, reaches registries without API connectivity in real time, reconstructs the beneficial-ownership chain with jurisdiction-specific control logic, cites every finding and reports gaps instead of guessing.
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
Related
- CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response alternatives
- Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
More Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Mave agentic SecOps (AI SOC agents)