CounterShadow AMI vs Opal Paladin
Quick answer
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd) | Opal Security |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident response | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://countershadow.com/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://countershadow.com/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CounterShadow AMI and Opal Paladin?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. CounterShadow AMI-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation, incident-response. Opal Paladin-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response: Not published Opal Paladin: Not published for Paladin.
Where are CounterShadow AMI and Opal Paladin headquartered?
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Opal Paladin publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response alternatives
- Opal Paladin alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
More Opal Paladin comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Opal Paladin
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Opal Paladin
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Opal Paladin
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Opal Paladin
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Opal Paladin