CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix vs Kiro
Quick answer
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS) | Amazon Web Services |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | FedRAMP |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and Kiro?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, iac, remediation. Kiro-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check).
Where are CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and Kiro headquartered?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France. Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) alternatives
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)