Cycode AI Teammates vs ZeroPath
Quick answer
Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) (Cycode) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) (Cycode) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cycode | ZeroPath |
| HQ | Israel · Middle East | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform. | AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, vulnerability management, remediation, sast, sca | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (the pricing page shows no amounts). | Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://cycode.com/maestro/ | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://cycode.com/maestro/ | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Cycode AI Teammates and ZeroPath?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast, sca. Cycode AI Teammates-only tasks: vulnerability-management. ZeroPath-only tasks: pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents): Not published (the pricing page shows no amounts). ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix): Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.
Where are Cycode AI Teammates and ZeroPath headquartered?
Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) publishes HQ in Israel. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) or ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) alternatives
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)