Dotfile Autonomy vs CLEAR Investigate
Quick answer
Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) (Dotfile (Dotfile SAS)) and CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) (Dotfile (Dotfile SAS)) and CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Dotfile (Dotfile SAS) | Thomson Reuters |
| HQ | France · Europe | Canada · North America |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Compliance | Risk, Compliance |
| Summary | Specialised AI agents that pre-investigate KYB cases end to end (documents, UBOs, AML screening hits, online reputation), auto-approve routine cases under the customer's policy and escalate edge cases with a full audit trail. | Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP (In Process) |
| Capabilities / tasks | kyc, aml, case investigation, alert triage, workflow automation | case investigation, aml, fraud detection, government compliance |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.dotfile.com/platform/dotfile-autonomy | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.dotfile.com/platform/dotfile-autonomy | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Dotfile Autonomy and CLEAR Investigate?
Both are listed under Risk. Shared tasks: aml, case-investigation. Dotfile Autonomy-only tasks: kyc, alert-triage, workflow-automation. CLEAR Investigate-only tasks: fraud-detection, government-compliance. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents): Not published CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams): Not published
Where are Dotfile Autonomy and CLEAR Investigate headquartered?
Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) publishes HQ in France. CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) publishes HQ in Canada.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) or CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail. · Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status.
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance.
- Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) — Agentic AI inside Trulioo's KYB verification workflow from Vancouver-headquartered Trulioo. When registries run out, the UBO Discovery Agent researches filings, disclosures, legal and public records, OSINT and verified third-party databases, reaches registries without API connectivity in real time, reconstructs the beneficial-ownership chain with jurisdiction-specific control logic, cites every finding and reports gaps instead of guessing. · Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AML and transaction-monitoring AI agents — 57 listings (Anti-money-laundering, transaction monitoring and financial-crime investigation)
- KYC and identity AI agents — 48 listings (Know-your-customer, identity verification and onboarding)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) alternatives
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents) comparisons
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents)
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents)
- Black Kite AI Agent vs Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents)
- Blinqx KYC Agent (Wwft client due diligence and UBO checks for accounting firms) vs Dotfile Autonomy (KYB/AML review agents)
More CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) comparisons
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- OneTrust vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) vs UpGuard
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)