Drata vs episki Autonomous GRC
Quick answer
Drata (Drata) and episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Drata (Drata) and episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Drata is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, CMMC.
| Field |  Drata |  episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Drata | episki (episki, llc) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | Compliance and trust management platform with AI-assisted evidence collection, continuous control monitoring, and multi-framework programs. | A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, CMMC | — |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | Drata Trust Management Platform · FedRAMP Authorized · FR2600167032 · 20x Low · authorized 2025-12-05 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST, CMMC, EU Cyber Resilience Act, AIUC-1 | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act |
| Capabilities / tasks | evidence collection, control monitoring, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, trust center | policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust center |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | AWS, Azure | Not recorded in this dataset yet |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based. AWS Marketplace Foundation Package listed at $15,000/year for 1–50 employees (third-party census of marketplace listing). Drata says Agentic TPRM is not priced by vendor count: every vendor gets a free inherent-risk assessment and customers pay only when a vendor needs a full security review (amounts not published). | Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. |
| Pricing model | annual-contract | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://drata.com/ | https://episki.com/product/ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://drata.com/ | https://episki.com/product/ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Drata and episki Autonomous GRC?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: evidence-collection, questionnaire-automation, vendor-risk, trust-center. Drata-only tasks: control-monitoring. episki Autonomous GRC-only tasks: policy-management, control-mapping, risk-assessment. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Drata: Quote-based. AWS Marketplace Foundation Package listed at $15,000/year for 1–50 employees (third-party census of marketplace listing). Drata says Agentic TPRM is not priced by vendor count: every vendor gets a free inherent-risk assessment and customers pay only when a vendor needs a full security review (amounts not published). episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence): Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.
Where are Drata and episki Autonomous GRC headquartered?
Drata publishes HQ in United States. episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Drata or episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Drata alternatives
- episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More Drata comparisons
- Vanta vs Drata
- Drata vs Secureframe
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Drata
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Drata
- Complyance GRC AI Agents vs Drata
More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)