Endor Labs security agents vs Escape
Quick answer
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) (Endor Labs) and Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) (Endor Labs) and Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Endor Labs | Escape |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Pre-built AppSec agents that read Endor findings against your source, write SAST fixes or file exceptions, pick safe dependency upgrades and open PRs, and answer malware-exposure and CI/CD posture questions inside your coding agents. | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, remediation, vulnerability management | appsec, pen test management, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Free Developer tier (AURI, no account required); Core and Pro tiers and add-on products are 'Get started' / 'Get pricing' with no list prices on endorlabs.com/pricing. | Quote-based |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows | https://escape.tech/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Endor Labs security agents and Escape?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Endor Labs security agents-only tasks: sast, sca, remediation, vulnerability-management. Escape-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation): Free Developer tier (AURI, no account required); Core and Pro tiers and add-on products are 'Get started' / 'Get pricing' with no list prices on endorlabs.com/pricing. Escape (AI pentesting and DAST): Quote-based
Where are Endor Labs security agents and Escape headquartered?
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) publishes HQ in United States. Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) or Escape (AI pentesting and DAST). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) alternatives
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)