Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Semgrep Multimodal
Quick answer
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Semgrep Multimodal (Semgrep) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Semgrep Multimodal (Semgrep) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |  Semgrep Multimodal |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Escape | Semgrep |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Semgrep’s AI layer (successor branding to Semgrep Assistant) for detection, triage, remediation guidance and optional autofix on the Semgrep AppSec Platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pen test management, attack surface | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based | Free Edition: no charge for up to 10 contributors, 60 AI credits included, up to 10 private repositories. Teams starts at Code or Supply Chain $30/month/contributor and Secrets $15/month/contributor, with 20 AI credits per developer/month. Enterprise is volume/quote with 50 AI credits per developer/month. Figures from semgrep.dev/pricing at last check. |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ | https://semgrep.dev/products/semgrep-multimodal |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://escape.tech/ | https://semgrep.dev/products/semgrep-multimodal |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Escape and Semgrep Multimodal?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Escape-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface. Semgrep Multimodal-only tasks: sast, remediation, pr-review, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST): Quote-based Semgrep Multimodal: Free Edition: no charge for up to 10 contributors, 60 AI credits included, up to 10 private repositories. Teams starts at Code or Supply Chain $30/month/contributor and Secrets $15/month/contributor, with 20 AI credits per developer/month. Enterprise is volume/quote with 50 AI credits per developer/month. Figures from semgrep.dev/pricing at last check.
Where are Escape and Semgrep Multimodal headquartered?
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) publishes HQ in France. Semgrep Multimodal publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) or Semgrep Multimodal. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Semgrep Multimodal alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
More Semgrep Multimodal comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Semgrep Multimodal
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Semgrep Multimodal
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Semgrep Multimodal
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Semgrep Multimodal
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Semgrep Multimodal