Ethiack Hackian vs Material Security AI agents
Quick answer
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Ethiack | Material Security |
| HQ | Portugal · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://ethiack.com/ | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://ethiack.com/ | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Ethiack Hackian and Material Security AI agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Ethiack Hackian-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation, incident-response, cloud-security. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting): Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote.
Where are Ethiack Hackian and Material Security AI agents headquartered?
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) publishes HQ in Portugal. Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) or Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) alternatives
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)