Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) vs Opal Paladin
Quick answer
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Ethiack | Opal Security |
| HQ | Portugal · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://ethiack.com/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://ethiack.com/ | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Ethiack Hackian and Opal Paladin?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Ethiack Hackian-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management. Opal Paladin-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting): Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. Opal Paladin: Not published for Paladin.
Where are Ethiack Hackian and Opal Paladin headquartered?
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) publishes HQ in Portugal. Opal Paladin publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) alternatives
- Opal Paladin alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
More Opal Paladin comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Opal Paladin
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Opal Paladin
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Opal Paladin
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Opal Paladin
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Opal Paladin