Fieldguide Field Agents vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
Quick answer
Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) and KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) (KaitoSec (KaitoSec GmbH)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) and KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) (KaitoSec (KaitoSec GmbH)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) is tagged for ISO 27001, DORA.
| Field |  KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Fieldguide | KaitoSec (KaitoSec GmbH) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Germany · Europe |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | Agent workforce for audit and advisory firms: agents plan engagements, run testing through to workpapers, review conclusions against evidence and draft financial statements, coordinated by Field Orchestrator. | German agentic GRC/ISMS platform whose agents import and map existing registers and documents, check them against the method (e.g. BSI IT-Grundschutz), turn gaps into owned tasks, propose risk ratings and controls, assign evidence, prepare audit answers and reassess risks when a record changes, with no change taking effect without human approval. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | ISO 27001, DORA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001, BSI IT-Grundschutz, NIS2, DORA, SOC 2, TISAX, ISO 22301, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, GDPR |
| Capabilities / tasks | audit management, control testing, evidence collection | gap analysis, control mapping, risk assessment, evidence collection, policy management |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Not recorded in this dataset yet | AWS, Azure, GCP, Microsoft 365 / Entra, Jira |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview | https://kaitosec.app/en/platform/ai-assistant |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview | https://kaitosec.app/en/platform/ai-assistant |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Fieldguide Field Agents and KaitoSec AI agents?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: evidence-collection. Fieldguide Field Agents-only tasks: audit-management, control-testing. KaitoSec AI agents-only tasks: gap-analysis, control-mapping, risk-assessment, policy-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Fieldguide Field Agents: Not published KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform): Not published
Where are Fieldguide Field Agents and KaitoSec AI agents headquartered?
Fieldguide Field Agents publishes HQ in United States. KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) publishes HQ in Germany.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Fieldguide Field Agents or KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Related
- Fieldguide Field Agents alternatives
- KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More Fieldguide Field Agents comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
More KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
- Egerie Jerry (agentic Cyber GRC platform) vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
- Fidureon compliance agents vs KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform)
- KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) vs Noru Agentic Compliance (GRC agents)
- KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) vs VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents)