Fieldguide Field Agents vs Secureframe
Quick answer
Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) and Secureframe (Secureframe) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) and Secureframe (Secureframe) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Secureframe is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP, CMMC.
| Field |  Secureframe | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Fieldguide | Secureframe |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Security |
| Summary | Agent workforce for audit and advisory firms: agents plan engagements, run testing through to workpapers, review conclusions against evidence and draft financial statements, coordinated by Field Orchestrator. | Compliance automation platform with Comply AI features for policies, remediation, risk, questionnaires and TPRM, plus Trust Center and CMMC/Defense packages. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP, CMMC |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | Secureframe Platform · FedRAMP Authorized · FR2529360449 · 20x Moderate · authorized 2026-06-23 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA |
| Capabilities / tasks | audit management, control testing, evidence collection | evidence collection, policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, trust center |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Not recorded in this dataset yet | AWS, Azure, GCP, GitHub, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 / Entra, Jira, Slack |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Quote-based. Public page lists Fundamentals / Complete / Defense feature packages without dollar amounts on the pricing page at last check. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview | https://secureframe.com/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview | https://secureframe.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Fieldguide Field Agents and Secureframe?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: evidence-collection. Fieldguide Field Agents-only tasks: audit-management, control-testing. Secureframe-only tasks: policy-management, questionnaire-automation, vendor-risk, trust-center. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Fieldguide Field Agents: Not published Secureframe: Quote-based. Public page lists Fundamentals / Complete / Defense feature packages without dollar amounts on the pricing page at last check.
Where are Fieldguide Field Agents and Secureframe headquartered?
Fieldguide Field Agents publishes HQ in United States. Secureframe publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Fieldguide Field Agents or Secureframe. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Fieldguide Field Agents alternatives
- Secureframe alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
- Secureframe alternatives
More Fieldguide Field Agents comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs Fieldguide Field Agents