Filigran XTM One vs Hoxhunt Respond
Quick answer
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |  Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Filigran (Filigran SAS) | Hoxhunt |
| HQ | France · Europe | Finland · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. | Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection | phishing triage, email security, incident response, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) | Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Filigran XTM One and Hoxhunt Respond?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Hoxhunt Respond-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response): Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call)
Where are Filigran XTM One and Hoxhunt Respond headquartered?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France. Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) publishes HQ in Finland.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) or Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
More Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)