Filigran XTM One vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing
Quick answer
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing (Patrowl) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing (Patrowl) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |  Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Filigran (Filigran SAS) | Patrowl |
| HQ | France · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. | Continuous external pentesting in which Patrowl's AI agents correlate assets, threats and past evidence, choose the next test step every day, and route every finding through a certified pentester before it reaches you. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, exposure management |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://patrowl.io/en/agentic-ai-penetration-testing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://patrowl.io/en/agentic-ai-penetration-testing |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Filigran XTM One and Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management, exposure-management. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, threat-detection. Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing: Not published
Where are Filigran XTM One and Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing headquartered?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France. Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) or Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
More Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing