Fleuret agentic AI pentesting vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management
Quick answer
Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) (Fleuret (FLEURET AI SAS)) and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) (Qualys (Qualys, Inc.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) (Fleuret (FLEURET AI SAS)) and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) (Qualys (Qualys, Inc.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Fleuret (FLEURET AI SAS) | Qualys (Qualys, Inc.) |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Paris-based agentic pentesting platform in which the Émile orchestrator coordinates 12-60 specialist attack agents (auth bypass, IDOR, injection chains, business logic, privilege escalation) against web apps and APIs, reports only findings proven with a replayable proof of concept, and re-tests fixes, with EU-sovereign hosting. | Agent marketplace inside Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management where teams 'hire' AI agents that detect new exposures without scanning, safely validate exploitability, re-rank risk by active threat campaigns and run confidence-gated patch and patchless remediation with rollback and re-validation. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, exposure management | vulnerability management, exposure management, remediation, risk prioritization, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on fleuret.ai: free organisation plan (scanners only, 2 users, 10 repositories); one-off pentest EUR 4,000 per web app; contract covering every app on quote. | Not published (30-day trial offered) |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://fleuret.ai/platform | https://www.qualys.com/apps/agentic-ai/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://fleuret.ai/ | https://www.qualys.com/apps/agentic-ai/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Fleuret agentic AI pentesting and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, exposure-management. Fleuret agentic AI pentesting-only tasks: pen-test-management. Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management-only tasks: remediation, risk-prioritization. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs): Published on fleuret.ai: free organisation plan (scanners only, 2 users, 10 repositories); one-off pentest EUR 4,000 per web app; contract covering every app on quote. Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid): Not published (30-day trial offered)
Where are Fleuret agentic AI pentesting and Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management headquartered?
Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) publishes HQ in France. Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) or Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) alternatives
- Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Fleuret agentic AI pentesting (Émile multi-agent orchestrator for web apps and APIs)
More Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management (Agent Val, Sara, Insta, Nyra, Sid)