FlowForma Assure vs CLEAR Investigate
Quick answer
FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) (FlowForma) and CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) (FlowForma) and CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | FlowForma | Thomson Reuters |
| HQ | Ireland · Europe | Canada · North America |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Security | Risk, Compliance |
| Summary | Evidence-first vendor security assessment where AI agents read SOC 2 reports, ISO certificates, pen tests and questionnaires, validate controls, score risk with cited reasoning, auto-approve low-risk vendors and route high-risk ones to analysts with follow-up questions framed. | Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF 2.0, NIS2, Cyber Essentials | FedRAMP (In Process) |
| Capabilities / tasks | vendor risk, questionnaire automation, risk assessment, workflow automation | case investigation, aml, fraud detection, government compliance |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.flowforma.com/flowassure | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.flowforma.com/flowassure | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between FlowForma Assure and CLEAR Investigate?
Both are listed under Risk. They share no task tags in this dataset. FlowForma Assure-only tasks: vendor-risk, questionnaire-automation, risk-assessment, workflow-automation. CLEAR Investigate-only tasks: case-investigation, aml, fraud-detection, government-compliance. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment): Not published CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams): Not published
Where are FlowForma Assure and CLEAR Investigate headquartered?
FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) publishes HQ in Ireland. CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) publishes HQ in Canada.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) or CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages. · Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) pair comparison
- Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail. · Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
- Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) — Agentic AI inside Trulioo's KYB verification workflow from Vancouver-headquartered Trulioo. When registries run out, the UBO Discovery Agent researches filings, disclosures, legal and public records, OSINT and verified third-party databases, reaches registries without API connectivity in real time, reconstructs the beneficial-ownership chain with jurisdiction-specific control logic, cites every finding and reports gaps instead of guessing. · Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AML and transaction-monitoring AI agents — 57 listings (Anti-money-laundering, transaction monitoring and financial-crime investigation)
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) alternatives
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment) comparisons
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment)
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment)
- Black Kite AI Agent vs FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment)
- Blinqx KYC Agent (Wwft client due diligence and UBO checks for accounting firms) vs FlowForma Assure (AI agents for vendor risk assessment)
More CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) comparisons
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- OneTrust vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) vs UpGuard
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)