Home / Compare / Hoxhunt Respond vs KELA Digital CTI Analysts

Hoxhunt Respond vs KELA Digital CTI Analysts

Quick answer

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) and KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) (KELA (Kela Research and Strategy Ltd.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)	KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts)
Vendor	Hoxhunt	KELA (Kela Research and Strategy Ltd.)
HQ	Finland · Europe	Israel · Middle East
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security
Summary	Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst.	Always-on agentic threat-intelligence analysts trained on KELA's cybercrime data lake: Alex (enterprises and MSSPs) and Ethan (government and law enforcement) monitor the organisation's threat landscape 24/7, prioritise and proactively surface leaked credentials, targeted threats and threat-actor profiles, answer analyst questions and generate RFIs, working inside existing tools via API, MCP, webhooks and a built-in SOAR.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	phishing triage, email security, incident response, remediation	threat intelligence, threat detection, alert triage, case investigation
Integrations (vendor-listed)	Not recorded in this dataset yet	REST API, MCP, webhooks, built-in SOAR, Slack, Microsoft Teams, email
Pricing (as published)	Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call)	Not published; demo-led, with a free start option on kelacyber.com (checked 2026-10-29).
Pricing model	quote	quote
Primary source	https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation	https://www.kelacyber.com/platform/digital-cti-analysts/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-29
Official site	https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation	https://www.kelacyber.com/platform/digital-cti-analysts/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Hoxhunt Respond and KELA Digital CTI Analysts?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Hoxhunt Respond-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, remediation. KELA Digital CTI Analysts-only tasks: threat-intelligence, threat-detection, alert-triage, case-investigation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response): Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call) KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts): Not published; demo-led, with a free start option on kelacyber.com (checked 2026-10-29).

Where are Hoxhunt Respond and KELA Digital CTI Analysts headquartered?

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) publishes HQ in Finland. KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) publishes HQ in Israel.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) or KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 52 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)