Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent vs noze CyberAgent

Print / Save PDF

Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) (Keepnet Labs (Keepnet Labs Ltd.)) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)	noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
Vendor	Keepnet Labs (Keepnet Labs Ltd.)	noze (noze S.r.l.)
HQ	United Kingdom · Europe	Italy · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Compliance
Summary	Human risk management platform whose AI agent reviews user-reported emails, opens investigations and proposes next steps in Incident Responder, with every action held in a human approval queue; the same agent builds and runs phishing simulations and awareness training. Per-user pricing is published.	Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001
Capabilities / tasks	phishing triage, email security, incident response, alert triage	attack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection
Pricing (as published)	Published per-user MSRP tiers on keepnetlabs.com/pricing (USD/EUR/GBP, by user band; e.g. Incident Responder bought alone is shown at about US$0.72–1.04 per user in the 25–1,000-user bands, and bundle plans from about US$1.40 to US$3.15 per user in the 25–500-user bands). Static capture: check the page for billing period and column mapping; 1,000+ users by quote.	From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.
Pricing model	published-tiers	published-tiers
Primary source	https://keepnetlabs.com/products/incident-responder	https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-21
Official site	https://keepnetlabs.com/products/incident-responder	https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent and noze CyberAgent?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, alert-triage. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization, evidence-collection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness): Published per-user MSRP tiers on keepnetlabs.com/pricing (USD/EUR/GBP, by user band; e.g. Incident Responder bought alone is shown at about US$0.72–1.04 per user in the 25–1,000-user bands, and bundle plans from about US$1.40 to US$3.15 per user in the 25–500-user bands). Static capture: check the page for billing period and column mapping; 1,000+ users by quote. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.

Where are Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent and noze CyberAgent headquartered?

Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) or noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.

Use-case comparisons

• Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) alternatives
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent (phishing incident response and agentic security awareness)

More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)