Kiro vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
Quick answer
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |  Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Mend.io (White Source Ltd) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. | AI capabilities in the Mend AppSec platform: Agentic Triage uses an LLM to classify each SAST finding as true positive, false positive or inconclusive with an evidence breakdown and exploitation path, and AI code remediation proposes fixes that can be turned into a pull request from GitHub, the PR check or Jira. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | FedRAMP | — |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Not recorded in this dataset yet | GitHub.com, Azure DevOps Repos, Bitbucket Cloud, Jira, Mend CLI |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). | Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29). |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://kiro.dev/powers/ | https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-29 |
| Official site | https://kiro.dev/powers/ | https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Kiro and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review. Kiro-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation-only tasks: sast, remediation, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation: Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29).
Where are Kiro and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation headquartered?
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States. Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation publishes HQ in Israel.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
More Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
- Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation