Kiro vs OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester
Quick answer
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) and OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester (OX Security (OX Appsec Security Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) and OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester (OX Security (OX Appsec Security Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |  OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | OX Security (OX Appsec Security Ltd) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. | OX's autonomous security agent connects to AI coding tools and IDEs to catch and correct risky or malicious code and dependencies before code is generated and to govern which coding agents, MCP servers and skills are used; the OX Agentic Pentester discovers, exploits and validates application vulnerabilities and maps them back to the source code. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | FedRAMP | — |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review | appsec, pen test management, sast, sca, ide assist, remediation |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Not recorded in this dataset yet | AI coding tools and IDEs, MCP servers, SCM / CI-CD, ticketing and messaging |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). | Quote-based package selector on the OX pricing page; 'Start Free' option offered (no amounts published; checked 2026-10-29). |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://kiro.dev/powers/ | https://www.ox.security/vibesec/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-29 |
| Official site | https://kiro.dev/powers/ | https://www.ox.security/vibesec/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Kiro and OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Kiro-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, pr-review. OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester-only tasks: pen-test-management, sast, sca, ide-assist, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester: Quote-based package selector on the OX pricing page; 'Start Free' option offered (no amounts published; checked 2026-10-29).
Where are Kiro and OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester headquartered?
Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States. OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester publishes HQ in Israel.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 35 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
More OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester
- Apiiro Guardian Agent (AutoFix and coding-agent protection) vs OX Security VibeSec agent and OX Agentic Pentester