Material Security AI agents vs Mondoo
Quick answer
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and Mondoo (Mondoo) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and Mondoo (Mondoo) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Mondoo is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |  Mondoo |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Material Security | Mondoo |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. | Agentic vulnerability management that finds, prioritizes, remediates and verifies fixes with policy-as-code and approval gates. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security | vulnerability management, policy as code, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. | Published pricing page at mondoo.com/pricing (verify current tiers). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://mondoo.com/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-15 |
| Official site | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://mondoo.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Material Security AI agents and Mondoo?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: remediation. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, cloud-security. Mondoo-only tasks: vulnerability-management, policy-as-code. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. Mondoo: Published pricing page at mondoo.com/pricing (verify current tiers).
Where are Material Security AI agents and Mondoo headquartered?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States. Mondoo publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) or Mondoo. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
Related
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- Mondoo alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)