Material Security AI agents vs noze CyberAgent

Print / Save PDF

Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)	noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
Vendor	Material Security	noze (noze S.r.l.)
HQ	United States · North America	Italy · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Compliance
Summary	Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published.	Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001
Capabilities / tasks	phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security	attack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection
Pricing (as published)	Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote.	From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.
Pricing model	published-tiers	published-tiers
Primary source	https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response	https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-21
Official site	https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response	https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Material Security AI agents and noze CyberAgent?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation, incident-response, cloud-security. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization, evidence-collection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.

Where are Material Security AI agents and noze CyberAgent headquartered?

Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) or noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.

Use-case comparisons

• Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)

More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)