Material Security AI agents vs Tenable One
Quick answer
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and Tenable One (Hexa AI) (Tenable) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and Tenable One (Hexa AI) (Tenable) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Tenable One (Hexa AI) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |  Tenable One (Hexa AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Material Security | Tenable |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Risk |
| Summary | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. | Exposure management platform with Tenable Hexa AI agentic orchestration for vulnerability triage and remediation workflows. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security | vulnerability management, exposure management, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-one/capabilities/hexa-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Material Security AI agents and Tenable One?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: remediation. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, cloud-security. Tenable One-only tasks: vulnerability-management, exposure-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. Tenable One (Hexa AI): Not published
Where are Material Security AI agents and Tenable One headquartered?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States. Tenable One (Hexa AI) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) or Tenable One (Hexa AI). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
Related
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- Tenable One (Hexa AI) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)