Home / Compare / Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent

Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent

Quick answer

Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) and Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation	Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
Vendor	Mend.io (White Source Ltd)	GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)
HQ	Israel · Middle East	Japan · Asia Pacific
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	AI capabilities in the Mend AppSec platform: Agentic Triage uses an LLM to classify each SAST finding as true positive, false positive or inconclusive with an evidence breakdown and exploitation path, and AI code remediation proposes fixes that can be turned into a pull request from GitHub, the PR check or Jira.	Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim)
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review	appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability management
Integrations (vendor-listed)	GitHub.com, Azure DevOps Repos, Bitbucket Cloud, Jira, Mend CLI	Not recorded in this dataset yet
Pricing (as published)	Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29).	Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).
Pricing model	published-tiers	published-tiers
Primary source	https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage	https://flatt.tech/takumi
Last checked	2026-10-29	2026-10-20
Official site	https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage	https://flatt.tech/takumi

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation and Takumi byGMO security AI agent?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability-management, pr-review. Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation-only tasks: none. Takumi byGMO security AI agent-only tasks: pen-test-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation: Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29). Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing): Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).

Where are Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation and Takumi byGMO security AI agent headquartered?

Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation publishes HQ in Israel. Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) publishes HQ in Japan.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation or Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Agentic pentesting AI agents — 35 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)